<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avalanche Warning: Federal Tax Law Could Bury Freelancers in New 1099s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/</link>
	<description>Where creatives, guides and geeks collide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Lainie</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Lainie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-550</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s hope this provision will be repealed. NYTimes Sept 11, 2010:

&quot;Many Democrats have joined Republicans in pushing for the repeal of a tax provision in the new health care law that imposes a huge information-reporting burden on small businesses.

&quot;To improve compliance, the law requires businesses to file a 1099 tax form identifying anyone to whom they pay $600 or more for goods or merchandise in a year. Businesses will also have to send copies of the form to their vendors, suppliers and contractors.

&quot;Businesses denounce the requirement, and even the national taxpayer advocate at the Internal Revenue Service, Nina E. Olson, said the reporting burden might &#039;turn out to be disproportionate as compared with any resulting improvement in tax compliance.&#039;” 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/health/policy/12health.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s hope this provision will be repealed. NYTimes Sept 11, 2010:</p>
<p>&#8220;Many Democrats have joined Republicans in pushing for the repeal of a tax provision in the new health care law that imposes a huge information-reporting burden on small businesses.</p>
<p>&#8220;To improve compliance, the law requires businesses to file a 1099 tax form identifying anyone to whom they pay $600 or more for goods or merchandise in a year. Businesses will also have to send copies of the form to their vendors, suppliers and contractors.</p>
<p>&#8220;Businesses denounce the requirement, and even the national taxpayer advocate at the Internal Revenue Service, Nina E. Olson, said the reporting burden might &#8216;turn out to be disproportionate as compared with any resulting improvement in tax compliance.&#8217;” </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/health/policy/12health.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/health/policy/12health.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Can they even enforce this?  There&#039;s no way this makes it through the cracks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can they even enforce this?  There&#8217;s no way this makes it through the cracks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Bill Witt (local CPA and Lawyer) also echoed this sentiment at a recent entrepreneur&#039;s forum mtg.

Crazy, and seems illogical. I can&#039;t imagine the resources required to enforce this each year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Witt (local CPA and Lawyer) also echoed this sentiment at a recent entrepreneur&#8217;s forum mtg.</p>
<p>Crazy, and seems illogical. I can&#8217;t imagine the resources required to enforce this each year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jimerson</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jimerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Ron: The IRS probably won&#039;t squeeze any more tax money out of Apple with this new law, but smaller businesses, used goods and other things that have fallen through the cracks would theoretically be captured with more paperwork for everyone. Watch out Tim... your freelance customers are now going to make sure you pay your taxes. 

Danielle: The way I understand it is the $600 minimum is a &lt;em&gt;total&lt;/em&gt; spent with one business for the tax year. Meaning, ten $60 purchases at Staples would require a 1099.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron: The IRS probably won&#8217;t squeeze any more tax money out of Apple with this new law, but smaller businesses, used goods and other things that have fallen through the cracks would theoretically be captured with more paperwork for everyone. Watch out Tim&#8230; your freelance customers are now going to make sure you pay your taxes. </p>
<p>Danielle: The way I understand it is the $600 minimum is a <em>total</em> spent with one business for the tax year. Meaning, ten $60 purchases at Staples would require a 1099.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-397</guid>
		<description>p.s. I think this would hurt &quot;Tim&#039;s Computer Shack&quot;

Thanks for the heads up Jeff.
Systems now set for DefCon 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. I think this would hurt &#8220;Tim&#8217;s Computer Shack&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up Jeff.<br />
Systems now set for DefCon 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Sheesh, This doesn&#039;t even make sense for a health care bill. So it only counts if it is over $600, which is good. If I had to gather Tax IDs for every one of my business expenses, I would do more administration than photography...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheesh, This doesn&#8217;t even make sense for a health care bill. So it only counts if it is over $600, which is good. If I had to gather Tax IDs for every one of my business expenses, I would do more administration than photography&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-395</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get where the extra tax money comes from? 

When I send apple a 1099 for buying a mac? Apple already pays taxes on my income.. are they just trying to better track that I spent money? Seems like an odd honor system. 

I think the IRS should just have our bank account access so that they can just taxes us ever year with out forms, I think it would help a lot. and its green because we would save a lot of paper!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get where the extra tax money comes from? </p>
<p>When I send apple a 1099 for buying a mac? Apple already pays taxes on my income.. are they just trying to better track that I spent money? Seems like an odd honor system. </p>
<p>I think the IRS should just have our bank account access so that they can just taxes us ever year with out forms, I think it would help a lot. and its green because we would save a lot of paper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Riopelle</title>
		<link>http://www.madcollective.com/2010/avalanche-warning-federal-tax-law-could-bury-freelancers-in-new-1099s/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Riopelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madcollective.com/?p=1150#comment-394</guid>
		<description>This won&#039;t be the last &quot;little&quot; surprise we find in this law. I hope for the sake of freelancers and small businesses, it&#039;s repealed altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This won&#8217;t be the last &#8220;little&#8221; surprise we find in this law. I hope for the sake of freelancers and small businesses, it&#8217;s repealed altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

